Former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte faced arrest in Manila following an order from the International Criminal Court (ICC) over charges of crimes against humanity. Duterte, known for his strongman rule and controversial policies, refused to comply with routine booking procedures, including fingerprinting, and resisted police efforts to transport him.
In a dramatic confrontation, he told law enforcers, “You have to kill me to bring me to The Hague.” Despite his protests, police successfully escorted the 79-year-old onto a government-chartered jet to the Netherlands, where he was detained upon arrival.
Duterte’s Arrest Sparks Chaos, Family Clashes with Police at Villamor Air Base
The arrest led to a prolonged standoff lasting approximately 12 hours at Villamor Air Base. Police Maj. Gen. Nicolas Torre detailed the chaotic events, including physical altercations involving Duterte’s family members. His common-law wife allegedly injured a police officer by hitting him with a cell phone, while his daughter verbally attacked law enforcers.
Duterte’s refusal to comply with fingerprinting procedures further delayed his transfer. A widely circulated video captured the tense moments, showing Duterte surrounded by supporters and resisting attempts to be taken to the waiting plane. Despite the resistance, authorities managed to complete the operation and fly Duterte to The Hague.

Duterte’s legal team condemned the arrest, arguing that Philippine authorities violated his constitutional rights and failed to provide an official copy of the ICC warrant. They emphasized that the Philippines is no longer a party to the ICC, questioning the legitimacy of the court’s jurisdiction.
Meanwhile, Vice President Sara Duterte, Duterte’s daughter, strongly opposed the government’s decision, calling it a betrayal of national sovereignty. In contrast, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. defended the government’s actions and dismissed allegations of political persecution, underscoring the legal process that led to Duterte’s extradition.
Duterte’s Arrest Signals a Shift Toward Accountability in Philippine Politics
Duterte’s arrest marks a significant downfall for the once-feared leader, who was notorious for his brutal anti-crime campaigns and controversial statements. His tenure was marked by aggressive policies, including a bloody war on drugs that led to thousands of extrajudicial killings.
While human rights groups have hailed his arrest as a victory against state impunity, his supporters see it as politically motivated. Duterte’s arrest reflects a broader shift in Philippine politics, where accountability for past leaders is becoming a central issue.
Before his arrest, Duterte had traveled to Hong Kong, where he addressed supporters, acknowledging the likelihood of his detention. He expressed resignation to his fate, stating that he was prepared to be jailed if necessary. Despite his defiance, his tone suggested a degree of acceptance, indicating that he foresaw his eventual capture. This acknowledgment contrasts sharply with his years in power, during which he dismissed human rights concerns and silenced critics with threats and harsh rhetoric.
Duterte’s political career has been defined by his unfiltered remarks and authoritarian approach to governance. His confrontations with world leaders, including former U.S. President Barack Obama and Pope Francis, further cemented his controversial reputation.
While his hardline stance on crime won him domestic support, it also led to widespread international condemnation. His arrest now serves as a significant moment in Philippine history, symbolizing both the potential for justice and the deep political divisions within the country.