The administration of the President of the United States has unequivocally stated that Russia’s recent presidential election fell far short of meeting any standards of being free or fair.
Jake Sullivan, the National Security Advisor, emphasized that despite Vladimir Putin‘s reelection as President of Russia, the election lacked legitimacy.
Putin (Credits: Britannica)
He pointed out that dealing with Putin’s leadership has been a necessity for the United States, particularly in light of Russia’s actions in Ukraine and other aggressive behaviors contrary to U.S. interests.
Sullivan underscored the lack of political freedom in Russia, citing the closure of political space, imprisonment of opponents, and even tragic deaths of some political figures. He emphasized that the predetermined outcome of the election was evident due to these constraints.
The condemnation of Russia’s election extends beyond the United States, with several Eastern European countries, the UK, and the European Union echoing similar sentiments. The UK Minister of Defence went as far as likening Putin to Stalin, underscoring the severity of the concerns.
White House (Credits: Getty Images)
The European Union specifically criticized the election for its numerous restrictions, absence of genuine opposition candidates, and the inclusion of votes from territories temporarily occupied by Russia, such as parts of Ukraine.
Josep Borrell, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, strongly condemned Russia’s decision to establish polling stations in these occupied territories, labeling it a blatant violation of international law.
The consensus among Western nations and international bodies is clear: Russia’s recent presidential election failed to meet the basic standards of democracy and fairness, and its outcome cannot be considered legitimate.
