Special counsel Jack Smith’s team has urged the Supreme Court to reject former President Donald Trump’s claim of immunity from prosecution in a case related to alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.
The arguments will be heard in about two weeks, with prosecutors submitting a brief just over that timeframe, emphasizing the importance of holding individuals accountable for actions that undermine democracy.
The prosecutors argue that Trump’s alleged scheme to misuse his official powers to overturn the election and disrupt the peaceful transfer of power goes against fundamental constitutional principles safeguarding democracy.
This case’s outcome, expected after the April 25 arguments, will likely determine whether Trump faces trial this year on a four-count indictment for conspiring to obstruct the transition of power after losing the election to Joe Biden.
Trump has contended that former presidents enjoy immunity for their official acts while in office. However, lower courts, including Judge Tanya Chutkan and a federal appellate panel, have rejected this argument. The Supreme Court’s decision to take up the case has added uncertainty about whether the trial can proceed before the upcoming election.
In their brief, Smith’s team reiterated that federal criminal law applies to the president, emphasizing that historical precedent does not support immunity for former presidents regarding official acts.
They also suggested that even if the Supreme Court were to recognize some level of immunity, the case should proceed because it involves Trump’s private conduct, not just official actions.
The special counsel’s team proposed that the court could make a narrow ruling specific to this case, denying immunity for Trump without establishing broader immunity principles applicable to other scenarios. This approach addresses the immediate legal question while leaving room for future considerations if similar issues arise in different contexts.