In the aftermath of the unprecedented Iranian drone and missile attacks over the weekend, Israel is poised to respond with a focus on sending a clear message of deterrence to Tehran, according to a senior Israeli lawmaker, Yuli Edelstein. The objective is to assert Israel’s sovereignty and draw a line under the recent hostilities.
Edelstein emphasized the importance of deterring further attacks while avoiding escalation into a full-scale war. Amidst considerations such as Western wariness, risks to aircrews, and the ongoing Gaza offensive, Israel aims to craft a response that balances retaliation with strategic restraint.
Acknowledging the necessity of a response, Edelstein highlighted the hope that Iran would grasp the lesson that unprovoked attacks on a sovereign nation carry consequences. While asserting Israel’s readiness to defend itself, he underscored the preference for de-escalation over vengeance.
The decision-making process for the Israeli response lies with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his war cabinet, with Edelstein as the chair of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee, playing a reviewing role in government decisions.
Israel Aims to Stop Back-and-Forth with Iran Through Response to Salvo (Credits: Deccan Herald)
The Iranian assault, featuring hundreds of unmanned drones, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles, marked a significant escalation in direct conflict between Iran and Israel. Despite the downing of most threats by Israeli and allied forces, the attack signified a departure from previous proxy conflicts, prompting Israel to carefully calibrate its response.
While Iran cited retaliation for an earlier strike on its embassy compound in Damascus, Israel reiterated its stance against allowing an open front with Iran, particularly amid ongoing engagements with Tehran-backed militias across the region.
Public sentiment in Israel reflects a range of opinions regarding the timing and nature of a potential strike on Iran. A Channel 13 TV poll revealed varying levels of support for immediate or delayed action, underscoring the complexity of public opinion amidst heightened tensions.
Despite casualties and damage resulting from the Iranian barrage, Edelstein emphasized Israel’s adherence to international norms, indicating a commitment to minimizing civilian harm while defending against threats.
Israel’s response to the Iranian attacks involved the deployment of warplanes and interceptors, signaling a robust defense posture aimed at safeguarding its territory and population. Edelstein emphasized the substantial cost involved in such defensive measures but affirmed their importance in preserving Israel’s security. Addressing concerns about interceptor missile supplies, he dismissed rumors of shortages, underscoring Israel’s ongoing efforts to maintain a sufficient defense capability in the face of evolving threats.
