On Friday, the Biden administration took major steps to address environmental hazards by designating two types of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as “hazardous substances,” thereby facilitating the imposition of cleanup responsibilities on companies responsible for their release.
This move, spearheaded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), aims to tackle the pervasive presence of these cancer-linked chemicals in the environment, particularly in water bodies across the United States.
PFAS, utilized in the production of nonstick and waterproof products as well as firefighting foam, have been identified as pollutants, contaminating various sites such as chemical plants and military installations.
EPA Administrator Michael Regan (Credits: Rolling Stone)
The EPA’s decision targets two particularly harmful PFAS variants, known as PFOA and PFOS, under the Superfund law, granting the agency enhanced authority to investigate and remediate polluted areas while holding accountable the entities responsible for their discharge.
The EPA’s strategy emphasizes prioritizing efforts towards major polluters, including manufacturing companies and federal facilities associated with PFAS production or usage. This strategic focus is aimed at expediting cleanup operations and ensuring that responsible parties bear the financial burden of remediation activities.
By reducing exposure to PFOA and PFOS, the EPA anticipates a decline in associated health risks, such as kidney cancer and thyroid disorders, thus safeguarding public health.
EPA Administrator Michael Regan emphasized President Biden’s recognition of the threats posed by these “forever chemicals” and highlighted the importance of the Superfund designation in enabling swifter and more comprehensive cleanup measures.
Michael Regan (Credits: NRDC)
Despite the EPA’s efforts, opposition from industry stakeholders and certain political factions has emerged, citing concerns over potential financial implications for smaller entities and essential public services.
However, the EPA clarified that its enforcement policy aims to spare community water and sewer systems, publicly owned landfills, airports, and local fire departments from cleanup obligations, focusing instead on major contributors to PFAS pollution.
Environmental advocates welcomed the EPA’s initiative, hailing it as a crucial step towards protecting communities affected by PFAS contamination.
Earthjustice legislative counsel Christine Santillana expressed optimism about the accelerated cleanup of heavily polluted sites and the improved health outcomes for impacted individuals resulting from the EPA’s actions.
