The High Court has made a remarkable decision in the case of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, granting him permission to launch a new appeal against extradition to the US.
This ruling allows Assange to challenge the order for his extradition, particularly focusing on concerns regarding the conduct of his prospective trial and the potential infringement of his right to free speech.
Assange’s legal team welcomed the decision, emphasizing that the case against him, stemming from the release of classified documents about alleged US war crimes, is politically motivated.
The documents, leaked through WikiLeaks, shed light on sensitive information regarding the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, leading to accusations from the US that Assange endangered lives.
The appeal process will center on whether US courts would safeguard Assange’s right to free speech as an Australian citizen. Hundreds of supporters gathered outside the court, where cheers erupted upon hearing the decision, signaling a temporary halt to Assange’s potential extradition.
Assange’s wife, Stella Assange, hailed the ruling as a “turning point” and called on the US to abandon what she termed as a “shameful attack on journalists.”
The US Department of Justice has labeled the leak as one of the most important breaches of classified information in US history, alleging that Assange’s actions compromised national security.
The case has garnered international attention, with Assange’s legal team arguing that he exposed war crimes and that the extradition proceedings are a form of state retaliation.
While the US government has provided assurances regarding the death penalty and trial rights, concerns persist about potential violations of free speech.
The latest development comes despite reports that US President Joe Biden is considering a request from Australia to drop Assange’s prosecution and allow him to return to his native country.