New York’s highest court rejected Donald Trump’s appeal regarding the gag order imposed in his criminal hush money trial. The Court of Appeals declined to hear Trump’s challenge, stating that no substantial constitutional question was directly involved. Consequently, the gag order remains in effect, preventing Trump from discussing jurors, witnesses, and other case-related parties.
Trump’s legal team had argued for the gag order’s termination since the trial had concluded. They emphasized that the restriction was unwarranted post-trial. However, the Manhattan District Attorney’s office countered this, advocating for the order to remain until after sentencing and the resolution of post-trial motions.
NY Court Upholds Gag Order on Trump Amid Post-Trial Legal Battle
In response, Trump’s campaign spokesperson criticized the gag order as unconstitutional and claimed it unjustly silenced Trump during a critical time in his campaign. The spokesperson asserted that voters have a right to hear Trump’s message, implying the order interfered with his ability to communicate with the public.
The decision comes after Trump was found guilty on multiple felony counts related to falsifying business records linked to payments made to Stormy Daniels. He faces sentencing in July, shortly before the Republican Party’s nominating convention. While the maximum penalty for his crimes could involve prison time, the actual sentence remains to be determined by Judge Juan Merchan.
Trump’s attorney and the Manhattan DA’s office declined to comment on the court’s decision. The ongoing legal battles over the gag order highlight the continuing legal challenges Trump faces even after the trial’s conclusion, as well as the broader implications for free speech and public discourse surrounding high-profile criminal cases.
