Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), a prominent global advertising association, has suspended its operations following a lawsuit filed by Elon Musk’s X. The lawsuit, filed in a Texas federal court, accuses GARM of intentionally boycotting the X platform and pressuring its member brands to reduce or eliminate advertising on X.
This development was confirmed by the World Federation of Advertisers, which oversees GARM, and has caused a significant stir in the advertising world, especially given the high-profile nature of the parties involved.
The suspension of GARM’s operations has been welcomed by X, with CEO Linda Yaccarino publicly expressing optimism about the potential for broader reform in the advertising ecosystem. The lawsuit names major brands like Unilever, Mars, CVS Health, and Orsted as part of the boycott against X, which is especially concerning given that GARM represents around 100 brands globally.
The lawsuit comes at a time when X has been struggling with declining ad revenue and a shrinking pool of advertisers since Musk took control of the company in 2022.
This is not the first time GARM has faced legal challenges. The lawsuit also references earlier accusations from the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee, which alleged that GARM was limiting consumer choices and violating antitrust laws.
Additionally, this lawsuit follows previous legal actions by X against Media Matters and the Center for Countering Digital Hate, both of which had criticized X’s content policies. These actions highlight the ongoing tensions between X and organizations concerned with media responsibility and content moderation.
The backdrop to this legal conflict includes broader concerns about the content on X. Reports have indicated a rise in hate speech and illegal content on the platform since Musk’s takeover, leading to increased scrutiny and advertiser withdrawals.
While X has implemented policies to label hate speech, the overall decline in content moderation quality has driven advertisers away, reluctant to have their brands associated with potentially harmful content. Some observers speculate that Musk’s own behavior and management style may have played a significant role in the loss of advertisers.
The suspension of GARM has been celebrated by those who have criticized the organization. Linda Yaccarino’s positive reaction underscores X’s satisfaction with this outcome, while a spokesperson for the House Judiciary Committee described it as a victory for free speech and the committee’s oversight efforts.
This development marks a significant moment in the ongoing debate over media responsibility, advertising practices, and the influence of powerful figures like Elon Musk on the digital advertising landscape.