Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a leading contender for Vice President Harris’s running mate, faces skepticism about his fit for the traditional attack-dog role. Unlike typical vice presidential candidates, Kelly, known for his clean-cut image and focus on policy, seems less suited to confrontational politics.
John LaBombard, a Democratic strategist, pointed out, “Ideally, the vice presidential candidate should be adept at going after the opposition without alienating potential voters. Kelly may need to develop this skill compared to others like Gov. Tim Walz.”
Recently, Kelly has attempted to embrace a more combative stance, remarkably criticizing Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) for his derogatory remarks about Vice President Harris. Kelly took the opportunity to address Vance’s controversial comments, denouncing them as “obnoxious and rude” and expressing concern over Vance’s views on sensitive issues like abortion.
Despite Kelly’s attempts at a more aggressive approach, he maintains that his focus is on supporting Vice President Harris’s campaign rather than auditioning for the vice presidential slot. “My priority is ensuring Kamala Harris wins,” Kelly said, emphasizing his commitment to the broader goal rather than personal ambitions.
Steve Jarding, a Democratic strategist, acknowledges Kelly’s potential despite his non-traditional role. He values Kelly’s background and calm demeanor, suggesting that his strengths may outweigh his lack of typical attack-dog qualities. However, Jarding also notes that the absence of an aggressive approach might be seen as a disadvantage among some voters.
Kelly’s recent media appearances and vocal support for President Biden signal his active role in the campaign, but there remains concern about the implications for his Senate seat if he were to join Harris’s ticket.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who recruited Kelly for the Senate, has refrained from commenting on the potential impact of Kelly’s departure, expressing confidence in Harris’s eventual choice for vice president.