Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Ohio Senator JD Vance both have noteworthy military backgrounds, but tensions have arisen over the details of their service following their vice-presidential nominations. Vance, a Marine veteran, initiated the dispute by accusing Walz, who served in the National Guard for 24 years, of “stolen valor” for allegedly misleading claims about his military experience.
At a campaign event, Vance questioned Walz’s references to his service, implying that Walz had exaggerated his role by suggesting he had seen combat. The controversy stems from a video where Walz, discussing gun control, mentioned carrying weapons “in war,” though he has never served in a combat zone.
Tensions rise over Tim Walz’s military service claims, with JD Vance challenging the accuracy of Walz’s experience
Walz’s supporters countered that Vance himself admitted to not experiencing real combat during his deployment in Iraq and stressed that Walz never misrepresented his military rank.
Walz’s service record has sparked debate, with some critics alleging he retired from the National Guard to avoid deployment to Iraq. However, his supporters clarify that Walz retired honorably as he prepared to run for Congress. His rank as a command sergeant major has also been questioned, though it was confirmed post-retirement due to his service.
Despite the attacks, Walz’s long service and focus on veterans’ issues during his congressional career have earned him respect among many veterans and political allies. Meanwhile, Vance’s military service, although honorable, did not involve direct combat, which complicates his criticism of Walz.
