As MAGA Republicans have drifted away from the center, Democrats have increasingly claimed that space. The recent Democratic National Convention in Chicago, particularly its concluding day, cemented this shift.
The convention was striking for its patriotic tone—not the divisive, extreme nationalism of some other factions, but a sincere, all-American patriotism reminiscent of July 4th celebrations. The event was marked by flag-waving, chants of “USA! USA!”, and affirmations of “the unfinished promise of this great nation.” This atmosphere was upbeat and reassuring, evoking a spirit akin to the McCain Republican convention of 2008.
In a remarkable move, Democrats honored military service by featuring numerous veterans who had served regardless of the sitting president, underscoring their commitment to country over politics. The convention further showcased this bipartisan spirit by giving a prime-time speaking slot to former Republican Representative Adam Kinzinger, who praised the Democrats for their patriotism and commitment to American values, on par with conservative ideals.
Remarkably, the convention sidestepped the divisive identity politics often associated with progressivism. Instead, delegates focused on national pride and unity, with minimal focus on divisive issues. This shift is reflected in Vice President Kamala Harris’s matured, pragmatic stance. Her acceptance speech highlighted commitments to maintaining a strong military, supporting Israel and NATO, and addressing border security, echoing themes that could align with conservative priorities.
While Harris’s policies may not align perfectly with every conservative viewpoint—such as her stance on corporate taxes—she embodies a centrist approach that could resonate across party lines. Her commitment to upholding democracy, international alliances, and American values stands in stark contrast to the more radical elements within both major parties.
Harris’s centrist and pragmatic approach, coupled with her dedication to preserving core American values, suggests that while disagreements on specific policies may exist, she represents a stable choice for leadership. For conservatives prioritizing the protection of essential democratic principles, supporting her over a potential second term for Donald Trump seems a clear path.